Pages Navigation Menu
Categories Navigation Menu

Astronomical sum of money

From: Gary S Gevisser <>
Date: March 30, 2012 12:29:55 PM PDT
To: Michael Gardiner <>

Subject: Astronomical sum of money – Re: Meet today -Re: The penny dropped – Re: Appellant Gevisser Vs Knuff Appellee


Marie and I have a meeting downtown so we will drop off the documents. When can we meet on Monday?

How does Marie protect her IRA and cabin that was prior to our marriage?

Part II of what I was going to send you which you understand is part of the script of the documentary, will be sent to Mr. Jeffrey R. Krinsk who understands better than most how I operate, and that includes helping him get a highly confidential letter off the desk of the General Counsel, W. H. Nichols
for Revlon that proved extraordinarily valuable $10 million settlement that Revlon’s insurance carrier agreed to settle soon after the most important 9+ hour deposition that Mr. Krinsk did on October 17, 2002 – CLICK HERE – one week before Marie’s and my huge court victory against her ex The IT who introduced Marie’s most carefully worded will 

that she had a close neighbor attorney witness on January 3, 2002, which was the day De Beers-Vivendi’s share price began an unprecedented and precipitous 280 day collapse losing sum $63 billion in market value – see on Yahoo message board  momworker63 crying out for help from me on June 10, 1999 when I began to bring public international attention to this injustice.

The purpose of introducing that will was only to intimidate Marie in order that she would leave me, and in the process The IT left the most clear trail of ALSO violating my civil rights when he illegally accessed my proprietary database.

Notice that it did not work, but it did allow Marie to see the evil all around her that much clearer.

Let me mention again. I am the most connected person I know in the world. I have a great number of friends who knew me very well before I immigrated to the US on March 17, 1978 when upon landing I knew that I was on my way to become, were I to choose stupidly corruption, far more financially richer than Nicholas Oppenheimer who very carefully places his net worth at $6 billion, without explaining the value of the goods that he has on the 3 Branches of the US Government that allows him to summon someone like Putin to Johannesburg and make this very macho killer look so impotent. 

$6 million is also the sum of money that my “lucky uncle” Dave received as a sign on bonus when agreeing to take on the added responsibilities as executor of Mossad assassinated German-American Charles W. Engelhard Jr. 

$6 million was also the amount of money Chairman of the Board of Hearst Corporation Randolf Apperson Hearst offered me in early 1994 as an advance on the book-documentary of book-documentaries that I’m sharing for free with the world which makes it increasingly difficult for anyone to get a competitive advantage over the next person, while those who have received the information prior leave telltale signs including their silences.

You don’t think for a moment that I am naive about the business of making money; and I assume that you bringing up yesterday this gold mine deal friends of yours are looking for investors, was not for you to charge me for your time given how well I explained that your friends are either the biggest crooks or totally naive.

The chronology of events is most important and particularly so when there is as clear as day wrongful conviction of the most credible person on the planet, and everyone who is corrupt is looking for ways to suggest that there had to be something to this defamation lawsuit otherwise how would it be possible for a judge to come up with a $4 million judgement?

I still don’t see anything in your writings including your draft motions that address also what could be behind such an astronomical sum of money, other than it sends a message to others to try and grab from me and my wife as much as they can get before the $ becomes worthless.

Truth is hugely uplifting to those who haven’t been corrupted such as Michael Grant’s 3 kids.

[Word count 693]

On Mar 30, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Michael Gardiner wrote:

I am here for half an hour more and then gone for the rest of the day.  You can drop off the full document today without me here or we can get together on Monday.
As I told you yesterday, the case I found IS good.  Very good.  But I also told you that it would have been the case to raise (a) in Texas by a Motion to Quash and/or (b) in either of your first two Motions to Vacate here in California.  I am going to try to cast this new motion as a Motion to Set Aside (calling it something slightly different) and give the Court an opportunity to do the right thing.  But if the Court wants to ignore the Motion it can do so by summarily denying it as an improper Motion for Reconsideration. 
I’m also trying to come up with some evidence that we can characterize as “new” to satisfy the Motion for Reconsideration criteria.
Michael A. Gardiner
110 West “A” Street, Suite 950
San Diego, CA  92101
Phone:  619.238.9800
Fax:  619.814.3727
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission, including any attachments, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for review by the party to whom it is addressed. It may contain attorney client or attorney work product privileged and confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including any attachments, without reading or saving them in any manner. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
From: Gary S Gevisser []
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 10:00 AM
To: Michael Gardiner
Subject: Meet today -Re: The penny dropped – Re: Appellant Gevisser Vs Knuff Appellee
Neither of us still see what offering them peanuts will do. They are coming after our bank accounts. Of course we understand you want to get paid. You know that both of us understand your profession very well, which is why I decided to speed things up a little with Lloyds-De Beers of London insurance, and that documentary will speak loudly and clearly to this game.
Can we meet later today when dropping off copies of what Marie and I received in the mail yesterday, but our landlady only gave it to us this morning?
As you can see they are coming after Marie as well. 
They are wanting not only her cash in bank accounts, safety deposit boxes, but the gold she had in her IRA prior to our marriage on April 23, 2003.
Why are we bothering to even spend a penny on this motion since you are telling us that we are basically screwed, and the chances of this motion succeeding remote, and yet you said at the start of the meeting yesterday that you had good news with finding case law involving the Jewish Defense League [JDL] against itself? 
On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Michael Gardiner wrote:

I was teasing…and working on my iPad at home which is not conducive to a lengthy explanation.  My intention was to answer the substantive question this morning….which I will do now.

1,989 total views, 3 views today

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook