Pages Navigation Menu
Categories Navigation Menu

Scott Shane – Did you get my email titled, Heroism of the Chinese? – Part II

All he would have needed to do was to first open his mouth and speak.

The Oppenheimers were the racist South African Apartheid Regime who were not kind to people of color, because that is what being a racist is all about, when not covering the real purpose of the United States Government’s Apartheid Regime which was to give American monopolists like Engelhard not only the minerals of South Africa but with such an unimaginably “big stick” calling card to intimidate the crap out of the rest of the world trying to resist our “free brand” of capitalism.

The Chinese, like the Arabs had nothing to do with Auschwitz and company.

There is a reason why the Chinese are known in ancient scripture as “The Jews of Orient” because like us Jewish people, the hugely industrious Chinese live to learn, which does not mean they don’t know how to fight, but they would prefer to live in peace and take care of one another.

Doing the right thing, feels good for a reason.

The Apartheid Regime were supposed to be persona non-grata with the United States of America because of their Nazi Apartheid Laws which at their core provided the Oppenheimers with their slaves to work the mines whose riches were first shared with each and every American government official who kept quiet. (Not a single Chinese Government official was ever bought off by the Engelhard-Oppenheimers during the US Government’s maniacal, “In support of our south east Asia policy”, the same with the North Vietnamese and Cambodians.)

If the leaders of the Capitalist system are corrupt, and we all know it, how come we put up with it? Shouldn’t we at least shut our mouths when complaining about everyone else? (I guess that is what you are all now doing.)

Don’t mind me if I talk to myself. I have been without my gorgeous F-C wife for more than 24 hours and Mango is also pining.

You are focused on all the different means of exchange such as diamonds, money, gold, platinum, steel, uranium, water etc etc.

That is wrong thinking.

Focus on the wealth that those means of exchange have acquired for those who remain quiet, including their children and grandchildren.

The Oppenheimers thanks to my “lucky uncle” Dave who was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Engelhard’s Engelhard Enterprises South Africa in 1970 and would continue on through 1973 and along the way collect a cool $6 million from the estate of Engelhard when agreeing to become the 3rd executor of world’s richest mineral holdings whose main asset was the record of bribes paid to US elected and non-elected government officials including all the Chairmen of the US Federal Reserve and Securities Exchange Commission to name but two, inherited all of German-American Charles W. Engelhard’s South African assets, beginning right before he was assassinated by the Mossad on March 2, 1971, having turned just 54 the month before.

Now is the time, while I am still alive, to have me appear before the US Congress in open session as each of them get tried, not just for treason but the ongoing perpetration of genocide on the poor of the world.

Included in the list of expert witnesses would of course be all members of my immediate and extended family who for good reason are all very quiet because they perfectly understand even if it was not me sharing the irrefutable facts, any common sense person could figure it out on their own.

How does one get away with writing that you are opposed to the most brutal US regime following Nazi Germany who butter your bread, unless you own all media including Hollywood?

Yes, without my “lucky uncle” Dave’s 2006 memoir, THE UNLIKELY FORESTER it would be a little more difficult keeping you all so quiet, but unfortunately for you all, he did it, and it is very clear that he did not nail the US Government and all who have been corrupted under duress.

Can you think of a better way than this to guarantee my and my wife’s safety?

Are you afraid of the Oppenheimers as much as the United States Congress who can all understand why it is that the Oppenheimers continue to keep that “speaks for itself” photo up on their De Beers Wikipedia profile as well as Nicholas Oppenheimer’s very short personal profile, where it remains alone; not even a photo of church goer and charity generous Nick with his wife; and no mention of their children?

The Oppenheimers are now hiding for the first time since taking full control of Wall Street in 1929 when their US Congress gave them the green light to flaunt their stolen industrial might, as Sir Ernest Oppenheimer, Nick’s virulent anti-Semite grandfather, was named Chief Executive Officer of the combined De Beers-Anglo American Corporation who have never once provided an inventory of their diamonds, which would automatically and instantly make every diamond worthless and even more importantly it would show every bribe that has been paid going back to the turn of the last century, which of course the US Congress past and present as well as every US President past and present would prefer does not see the light of day.

Well fuck them and fuck all of you who stand in the way of Truth-Logic-G-d, and let’s not forget about progress.

Do you think it is important what I have to say?

Do you think the Jerusalem Post were wrong in publishing the first letter or all four?

(Does knowing that 2=2=4 make you feel more or less human?)

What if it turned out that I was right, that there is a connection between oil traders, who have like all the mineral monopolists no loyalty to country, race or religion, and terrorism, would you question today the role of all oil brokers including those who say they are not affiliated with the CIA?

Are you ready to burn every economics book along with any book on how to make money or get rich in real estate, that you have held on to, or do you plan to keep them as a memento to give to your grandchildren along with a copy of this email?

Do you have any objection with me copying the Texas 5th Court of Appeals?

Now moving on to that email from Mr. Ron Bellows dated May 3, 2004, without you forgetting that on February 1. 2001, the WAR ON TERROR had not yet begun and nor had Israel’s Foreign Intelligence Institute [Mossad] provided both the FBI and CIA with the most crystal clear “heads up” beginning one month prior to 9/11, which also meant that conscienceless financially rich Americans were about to get even richer while the poor of the world including American soldiers being pushed more than ever to be patriotic, were about to get much poorer, but still much better off than the poor in strategically positioned, more so than mineral rich countries, who ended up mortally wounded or with permanently disfiguring injuries which made them that much more dependent on the welfare state, and of course less of a physical threat once pumped with enough drugs.

You wouldn’t need much, if any military training, to realize Mr. Bellows’ communication is most disturbing.

First, it explains that the premier risk management specialist, at now US Government fully owned AIG, was being asked to do something most dishonorable which had him quickly moving towards drink, and he wasn’t just talking about one tot of scotch.

If he did his job right and didn’t insure the US Government’s most important and high risk defense/offense contractors beginning with Haliburton whose immediate former top dog was Vice President Cheney, because as Bellows states clearly that at the time he received his “marching orders”, which was the day before, “our loss numbers are showing lots more than the news is reporting” he would be fired and that much more a dependent of the increasingly growing welfare state; and if he didnt do his job right his name would not go to the top of the list of those to be fired by his future employers Haliburton-US Government and company, led by my former employer O
ppenheimer-De Beers-Anglo American Corporation.

Mr. Bellows is still employed by monopolist led US Government owned AIG; so you figure out what Mr. Bellows did right.

Mr. Bellows also stopped communicating with me once he became aware that I was sharing this information with Attorney General of New York State Elliot Spitzer, a close personal friend of Mr. Krinsk, who you may recall filed a refreshing criminal complaint against the megalopoly of AIG-Marsh McLennan and ACE Limited in mid-October 2004, but quickly pulled back one Spitzer realized that there was much more going on than the price fixing of insurance premiums. (If you have trouble finding my back and forth communications with Spitzer’s office on The Internet, please let me know.)

BTW, you are most likely unaware that American citizens have been banned from investing in De Beers’Lloyds of London Insurance for the past 2+ decades without the Securities Exchange Commission “crying foul”; in fact the SEC continue to approve of Lloyds selling their insurance policies to American citizens and American corporations, just so long as Lloyds does not send marketing material to American citizens enticing them to be investors in Lloyds because, again American citizens are persona non grata with Lloyds.

Do you find it confusing that all those running for the President of the United States including First Lady Michelle Obama’s neophyte husband have never once raised this most important “divide and conquer” ploy by the German-South African Oppenheimer family who have the US Government to thank for their continuing stranglehold on the world’s mineral resources beginning with water?

How about the fact that Lloyds while accepting worthless diamonds as money instruments from approved non-American investors, set the price of insurance worldwide?

How much more would you like to know about my background or are you as convinced as the silent?

Would you know why not a single reporter who is familiar with the most unlawful defamation conviction of me back on January 21, 2011 by a corrupt Texas judge, has written a story about this outlandish, precedent setting $4 million DEATH SENTENCE all designed to suppress the truth by regulating The Internet out of lawless Texas, which the presiding judge Martin Lowy, who refused me a jury trial, begins and ends the kangaroo court proceedings by stating clearly that not only did the prosecution, an ex CIA official never present a shred of evidence that I had committed anything close to defamation (because it was and remains the most egregious defamation of me), but that in handing me such an outlandish judgment of $4 million he was trampling on my Constitutional Rights to Free Speech etc etc?

Now if you still find that all confusing, lets come back to Lt. Col. Davis.

Why don’t you now ask him if he thinks Ron Bellows email of May 3, 2004 has any bearing on the ongoing very poor training of the Afghan army?

(Do you think if the illiterate and poverty stricken recruits were paid as much as Blackwater mercenaries who the US State Department officials prefer to have protecting them than regular US Army personnel including US Special Forces, Blackwater personnel would fill up all the ranks of the Afghan army and leaving them only to contend with the illiterate and poverty stricken in the refugee camps in neighboring Pakistan; but then the Afghan Army couldn’t really be called the Afghan Army just like the US Army cannot really be called the US Army when its highest paid soldiers are mercenaries?)

Would you like for me to make a formal introduction to Ron Bellows or would you prefer to know the history of why he would entrust me with such an incriminating email which helped lead me to the conclusion that the time was right for me to break my 24 year silence with my former employers Oppenheimer-De Beers-Anglo American Corporation back on 11.11.2004 when I hadn’t forgotten a thing about all the hoops I had to jump through before being entrusted with their “crown jewels”?

Ps – You would appreciate that all those who are silent are not guaranteeing my or my French-Canadian wife, Marie Dion Gevisser’s personal safety, and consequently I must continue to take the necessary steps to get this information out there. Feel free to ask Ms. Carol L. Dysinger, producer of Camp Victory Afghanistan to share our recent communications which now have her going through all the stages of denial.

[Word count 4060]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Shane, Scott wrote:
You’re confusing me. I did not get either the Heroism email or the Employment email. And I’m not sure what you mean by LTC Davis “going silent” — he’s given lots of interviews.

Scott Shane
New York Times
Washington bureau
202-862-0305
443-834-3648 cell
shane@nytimes.com

From: Gary Niod [mailto:garyniod@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 01:47 PM
To: Shane, Scott
Subject: Re: Did you get my email titled, “Heroism of the Chinese”?

At least you are still with me; and that is a very good sign.

I assume you got my “Employment opportunities” communique that I sent out last evening.

In the meantime, if you haven’t already come across the email that got Lt. Col Davis to go quiet, here it is below:

From: Ron Bellows Senior Risk Assessor for AIG
To: Gary S Gevisser
Monday, May 03, 2004 7:39 PM;
Subject: WE [megalopoly] insure… Haliburton

my point the other day – that these people have been taken and treated as war combatants when there is no war – is totally against the constitution – which apparently doesn’t exist anymore

BUT get this .. ..

I have now been given the project of trying to figure out our exposure for our overseas defense contractors we insure –

thing is – the policy excludes ‘acts of war’ ( as most do ) – BUT – includes Terrorism ??

so.. .If a contractor dies from an act of war – we pay the widow and the gov’t is supposed to reimburse us from their war chest

so now – the feds are saying – “there is no war” – and we don’t get reimbursed – for all the dead, captured and “lost” contractors ( and our loss numbers are showing lots more than the news is reporting )

so all the actuaries and underwriters are freakin out – watching their policy breach limits and bleed cash

so I got the order Sunday – go and figure out what KBR, Centcom and Haliberton employee exposure are and what they are doing to control their contract employees exposure ??

AND – this is a no win – If I pull the plug ( write a report that says its a poor risk ) my name goes to the head of KBR etc – If I say its all good – we loose money and megalopoly stomps on my tushy

aaagghhh

later boys

I need a drink . . . .

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Shane, Scott wrote:
Can’t check my Gmail right now. But didn’t get it here.

Scott Shane
New York Times
Washington bureau
202-862-0305
443-834-3648 cell
shane@nytimes.com

From: Gary Niod [mailto:garyniod@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 01:36 PM
To: Shane, Scott
Subject: Did you get my email titled, “Heroism of the Chinese”?

It was only a draft, but I inadvertently hit the send button.

1,144 total views, 3 views today

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook