Pages Navigation Menu
Categories Navigation Menu

What have I missed?

From: Gary S Gevisser <>
Date: March 29, 2012 1:09:56 PM PDT
To: “Michael Gardiner” <>
Cc: rest; Marie Dion Gevisser <>

Subject: What have I missed? – Re: “Security is everyone’s concern” – Re: Motion to set aside


We will try and get there by 2.

Attached is what you sent me earlier with my comments in red.

It could be a stronger statement beginning with the fact that I never met or communicated with Knuff but I did try reaching him on December 25, 2008 to give his side of the story in reference to his meeting with main co-defendant Tucker on 12.23.2008, which Knuff in sworn testimony on 1.21.2011 says he chose not to respond to, and which could have settled matters right then and there, but then how would he find a friendly court in Texas to give him the get rich quick settlement that he wanted?

I am well aware that you are attacking this on jurisdiction grounds, but I want to make absolutely certain you understand the entire scope of what is going on, just as anyone who comes to our website and has no questions because it is all so crystal clear; although it will get even clearer in the hours ahead.

It is most important that I was doing the right thing to follow up with Knuff who tells the court that he thought when working for the CIA that he was doing the right thing in serving his country blah blah, given how Tucker felt very physically threatened as the conversation with Knuff was mostly about De Beers and how easy it is to get others using bribes-extortion to kill and be paid in untraceable diamonds; all of which Tucker explains perfectly in his taped deposition he prepared on March 24, 2010 and which was included in my initial pleading on 4.1.2010, and which Judge Lowy struck from the record in order to begin hitting me with DEATH PENALTY sanctions, and yet the Texas Court records available on the internet still show that I responded in a timely manner and arguing much stronger than what I see in your draft declaration that Texas was the wrong jurisdiction. 

Knuff also states under oath that the conversation he had with Tucker was mostly about Tucker which flies falsely in the face of reality.

Equally important is that Tucker was severed from the lawsuit on the day I was handed the $4 million DEATH SENTENCE/DEFAULT JUDGMENT. In other words they have been attempting from the start to distance Tucker who is the person with all the information about Knuff, from me, and put it all on me in an effort to murder me financially and destroy my reputation.

Knuff after deciding not to respond to my email enquiry on December 25, 2008 then broke email communications with Tucker and began to call Tucker on the phone which had Tucker feeling that much more threatened; and on December 28, 2008 at 11:41 am California time, Tucker sent an email to the FBI and placed that email up after first putting up a bit of Knuff’s history as best he knew it on Yahoo where they both remain – CLICK HERE & CLICK HERE.

This first posting on December 27, 2008 is the one that Knuff finds the most troubling, and still it is not close to defamation; and more importantly, it has nothing to do with me.

ITT employee – Agent for CIA
ITT – System Design and Egnineering group department – Charles Dazler Knuff Born 1949
New York City
7 siblings
Mathematician / MBA
1967-1977 US Navy Intelligence 25 years Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

Notable Career Events

* Involved in US Navy’s investigation into the June 8th, 1967 attack by Israel on the USS Liberty.
* Specialized knowledge of the Middle East.
* Employed by the CIA during the recruitment and financing of PLO terrorist Ali Hassan Salameh in 1970 placing him on the CIA payroll some 2 years prior to Salemeh and his ‘Black September’ butchering of 11 defenseless Jewish Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich Olympics.
* Employed by the CIA during West Germany’s release of the surviving Black September terrorists following a contrived airplane hijacking of a Lufthansa passenger jet carrying 12 passengers none-of-which were women or children on October 29th, 1972.

Not to mention, you have the clear statements of Judge Lowy saying that he cannot find the defamatory statements Loewinsohn-Knuff say that I said and placed up on the Internet about Knuff “training PLO terrorists”.

In other words, if you are making the case for wrong jurisdiction which is also so crystal clear, perhaps you should also explain why they chose a legal jurisdiction where they were not required to provide evidence of defamation and when caught by the judge trying to admit false evidence in to the court record, the judge does not think it right to admonish these perjurers to the fullest extent of the law, instead hits me with a $4 million DEATH SENTENCE which Loewinsohn argues LOUD and CLEAR he plans to use to “send a message” to others.

Why not include in this declaration which may be the last before I take my final breath, a statement of sorts that this defamation on me of the Nth Degree is all about undermining my huge credibility in order to suppress my materially relevant and irrefutable information using intimidation of the Nth degree because it is the courts who are now assisting Knuff-Loewinsohn to have Texas regulate the Internet?

Where is there any reference to Judge Lowy candidly acknowledging that he is trampling on my Constitutional Rights to Free Speech under the 1st Amendment?

Up till now every lawyer and judge has said that what is missing from my pleadings is the failure to cite sufficient law and case studies. I see nothing of that nature in your draft declaration.

Why would Judge Lowy be so arrogant other than it will send just as clear a message to the rest of the justice system not to interfere with their gravy train as Lowy shows that no judge can get any lower, when demonstrating that the way to attack me and put only fear and greed into the hearts of anyone trying to assist me as he so OPENLY pushes to the side the Appearance of Propriety. [I have yet to take a poll of the world’s literate population, but I would bet my bottom dollar, the overwhelming majority of them and 100% of the illiterate would agree with me that I nailed this one.)

The fact that Knuff-Loewinsohn after intimidating Tucker to the point that he quickly turned on me right after doing the taped deposition, then tried to get Tucker to lie and say that these postings on Yahoo as well as Tucker’s Facebook “wall” were mine, should be troubling to the court, even if it is only their concern about word of this most egregious judicial abuse begins to spread like wildfire over the light-speed Internet.

The fact that Tucker refused to lie because he knew that he was the one responsible for all those postings does not mean that Knuff had either the right jurisdiction or evidence of defamation against me.

It is not exactly immaterial the fact that Tucker’s last ditch effort to save his own skin ended up backfiring, which inevitably had him sharing with me his secret email communications with Loewinsohn-Knuff beginning on March 30, 2010 when he filed a false physical assault charge against me that had California Superior Court Judge Adrienne Fifield reading Tucker the riot act 2 weeks later on April 14, 2010 when she refused to go along with his request for a Permanent Restraining Order, and had she known that Tucker was in secret negotiations to save his skin with Loewinsohn she would have most likely had him immediately handcuffed because she, like me, couldn’t figure out why Tucker had turned so quickly after doing that taped deposition that of course Knuff-Lowy-Loewinsohn knew all about and why it was never introduced during my kangaroo court trial.

It is so totally absurd that a judge would allow this case into court that it has been necessary for me to explain what could be behind such an egregious abuse of the justice system that I am exposing when I expose the gun-diamond-money power of De Beers.

The fact that Knuff waited until February 23, 2010, more than a year after this meeting with Tucker, to file the lawsuit in Texas shows that he was all about finding a friendly court where he could get such a huge payday.

Show me a case where it is so obvious that a criminal has managed to use the court system to extort monies?

How come there is nothing in the declaration about Judge Lowy not forcing Loewinsohn to prove up his damages after Knuff stated under oath that he had no damages?

How come there is nothing about Judge Lowy after handing me such an egregious and unprecedented $4 million DEATH SENTENCE then asking Loewinsohn whether I had the monies to pay the $4 million?

Don’t you think this judicial abuse including the fact that Texas has a one year statute of limitations on defamation, which Knuff blew, should be placed into the court record?

Let me know if you think there is anything that I have missed.
On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Michael Gardiner wrote:
The earlier the better…see if you can make it here by 2:00.
Michael A. Gardiner
110 West “A” Street, Suite 950
San Diego, CA  92101
Phone:  619.238.9800
Fax:  619.814.3727
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission, including any attachments, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for review by the party to whom it is addressed. It may contain attorney client or attorney work product privileged and confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including any attachments, without reading or saving them in any manner. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
From: Gary S Gevisser []
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:21 AM
To: Michael Gardiner
Cc: Marie Dion Gevisser
Subject: “Security is everyone’s concern” – Re: Motion to set aside
Then let’s meet at 2:30. The exhibits

1,713 total views, 3 views today

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook