So Defensive -: Commission

Jacob Anderson Too bad, because he was my favorite

19h

Robin McMillen replied
·
5 Replies   4 hrs

Gabriel Licina Your talking points sound pretty far right leaning atm dude.

19h

Gabriel Licina replied
·
11 Replies   7 hrs

Kimberly Forsythe Sex offenders have had the ability to gain back voting rights for a long time. I used to know one.

19h

Jacob Anderson replied
·
1 Reply

Michael Z Serrano The Democratic party is very divided. Unless they unite and find an appealing candidate they will not win. From my observations they have not learned from 2016

19h

Stephon Gatewood Wtf maybe that’s a strategy since repubs are super conservative maybe hes trying to be super liberal. Hopefully by time its voting time he isnt pushing for this cuz I dont see how it can benefit him at all

19h

Gary Gevisser Jacob Anderson, what if you know that the elections are rigged?

Do you have any evidence of anything else that is rigged?

18h

Hide 14 Replies

Jacob Anderson The elections aren’t rigged in the sense that they are controlled. There is fraud, hacked voting machines etc, but it has to be within the range of error of the polls, or it would be obvious. And if it’s that close, it’s not controlled with a definite winner/loser

18h

Gary Gevisser What if the money is rigged by international money speculators as President Nixon protested in his speech on August 15, 1971?

Do you have any economics studies from an accredited university?

17h

Gary Gevisser Jacob Anderson, can you tell me if you have been quiet these past 12 hours since my response yesterday at 7:55 PM Calif. time?

4h

Gary Gevisser Economist Dr. Rodney Smith Phd.

4h

Gary Gevisser Roch Chouinard, retired head of the Canadian Federal Government’s research acquistions department with 25 analysts underneath him.

4h

Gary Gevisser Gavin Ferrier, a South African politician, former policeman.

4h

Gary Gevisser Title: Commission

Christina Moritsch-Krall who explains quite accurately that her Austrian family’s 5th generation Trust Fund survived intact during the Nazi “accupation” [sic] because they are in Christina’s words, “First Line Nobility”.

Christina, however, doesn’t go on to explain that piece of knowledge was easy for Hitler and his Nazi bankers to ascertain and once they did then they provided the simple ultimatum, “Inform on your rich Jewish neighbors first and then we will decide whether you keep your monies or you increase the size of the trust fund, call it a commission; and if we don’t think you are working hard enough to rid the world of the Jewish plight you will lose everything because you won’t have any need for wealth once you are dead.”

4h

Gary Gevisser Robin McMillen, Janice Lipman, Jean Edelstein Gaylis, Micha-el Frame, Michael Ditz, Tomer Tene, Martine Alter, Beth Isaacs, Jane Beth Cantor, Harold Schenk, Harold Kravat, Brad Awerbuch, Ray Oshry, Patricia Herrera, Nina Senčar, Jack Anziska, Wayne Henlis, Wayne Lusvardi, Susan Sawsan Cain, Susan Munro, Michael Rodd, Ken Witucki, Rod Margo, Keisha Whitaker, Colin Schachat, Colin Wight, Hilton Greenbaum

Susan Sawsan Cain Gary Gevisser, please stop tagging me in these posts and remove my name from this one. I’ve nicely asked you to stop before, and I’ve asked you to stop bothering me.

3h

Gary Gevisser Susan Sawsan Cain, shortly I will post up on The Internet our entire discourse. Is there a spot where you have a particular preferance?

2h

Susan Sawsan Cain Gary Gevisser, I’d prefer you didn’t associate me with you.

1h

Gary Gevisser Title: So Defensive [Word count 1131]

Susan Sawsan Cain, your writings are clear that you prefer not to associate with me.
You obviously want that to be very public which is why you have chosen to be so outspoken. Therefore in my mind, you should welcome public scrutiny of everything that you have had to say, unless you would right now choose to change anything that you have previously said?

Remember your assertions are in stark contrast to the irrefutable facts I present.

I am of course questioning the value of your Masters in Accounting, and that is also very unsettling to other graduates and professors of accounting-finance-economics-law, and who when just beginning to read Professor Edward Jay Epstein’s epic, non-fiction novel, The Diamond Invention, feel their entire world imploding, and just hoping that all the rich of the world will continue to stick together, no different to when man was first herded into cities where life is much easier but it comes at a price, and be just as deafeningly silent.

I also take it that you are on social media Facebook for more reasons than wanting to appear intelligent?

You must expect a lot of support because you have been determined to prove to me that you are well educated in the accounting-finance-economics area.

In your contemplative moments you must have thought how someone like Socrates and his student Plato would view what our universities have pumped out over the past only 119 odd years following the brutal Anglo “American-JP Morgan” Boer War [1899-1902] which was perfectly coodinated with the American led 8 Allied Invasion of China in 1900 with us, the Unites States, tied at the hip with the following combatants:

British Empire

German Empire

Kingdom of Italy

Austria-Hungary

Netherlands

Belgium

Spain

French

Russian Empire, vile monopolist Czar Nicholas II the principal supporter of Jewish pogroms.

Empire of Japan, who backed by the United States ever since US Admiral Perry got the Japanese Merchant Fleet to surrender in the early 1850s and for which the US Congress warded Perry a bonus of $20,000, would go to war with Czar Nicholas II starting on Feb 8, 1904 and ending with the defeat of Russia on Sep 5, 1905, 101 years to the day before Mineral Monopolist, Uranium King, Nicholas Oppenheimer, the only son of Harry Oppenheimer met with Russian President Putin in Cape Town, South Africa.

 Page 2 – So Defensive

Susan Sawsan Cain, the fact that you can write to me on FB messaging, “I don’t know you. It doesn’t matter to me what your accomplishments are. I don’t know you” suggests, at least to me, that you have a very conflicted mind.

Why wouldn’t you want to know me by my writings in Israel’s Jerusalem Post which “set the cat amongst the pigeons”?

Your repetition of “I don’t you” was clearly an attempt to convince yourself or is that the way you normally write in a debate?

You are not very clear despite protesting how formerly well educated you are.

It is doubtful that you have other FB friends who have had articles published in an international newspaper and which are also so unsettling to those profiting the most from the corruption.

Nor can there possibly be anything more corrupt than the rigging of the price of the money.

When very sick Hitler-Goebbels protested, “The great masses will more easily fall victim to a big lie than a small lie”, they were not telling a half-truth.

It was the absolute truth.

While neither of them or for that matter any of their Brown Shirts were particularly well educated in the study of economics, they did understand the logic of the emissaries of the western alliance’s weapon developers approaching them with an offer they couldn’t refuse:

“Do not worry about anyone, including the western media getting the people upset because no one is going to object to us arming you in flagrant violation of the Versailles Peace Treaty because in committing to you the necessary raw war mineral resources as well as expertise in mass manufacturing weapons of war, we will have all the supermarket shelves stocked with food and beer for the privileged classes such as those First Line Nobility who behave as well as the most loyal members of the Hitler Youth Movement; and that would not include of course Jewish people unless they are rich and are willing to either buy their way to freedom and/or rat out fellow Jewish people”.

If someone’s accomplishments don’t mean anything to you, is that because you only debate people who agree with you, and trash the rest?

Do you have former FB friends who you have disagreed with and do you think they would be interested in our discourse?

You and I both know that at 6 of our 7 mutual FB friends were most keen to see our FB messaging dialogue and I suggested to all of them that they first contact you to get a copy.

You never did say which ones approached you.

As you say, you don’t know me, so what were you doing having such a long debate with me before writing your nonsense?

I do happen to agree with you that you would get a lot of support from all those whose formal education has interfered with their learning and that would include my 3 elder siblings who also quickly shut down when reading for the first time, Epstein’s The Diamond Invention book, but you will find that it is mostly silent support.

Should anyone start offering you money or other favors to distract me, I don’t expect you to tell me but I caution you about their trustworthiness.

Nor would you expect anyone who is negative even if it were the majority of us humans currently living to deter me in my efforts to educate others before they get too long in the tooth.

My suggestion is that we start right now, and encourage all those I have tagged as well as others interested in money-wealth, and have you explain what, if any, importance your Professors of Accounting attached to Off Balance Sheet transactions which have been the “staple diet” of mineral-banking monopolist De Beers-Barclays-JP Morgan since the turn of the last century when they became the undisputed owner of the world’s drilling industry.

Of course, if in fact your Professors failed to provide a detailed discourse in this most important aspect of De Beers-JP Morgan’s acquisitions as well as divestitures, which seems to be the case given how you have so beaten around the bush, then you should simply say, “Gary, off balance sheet transactions by mineral monopolists were never covered because if they were then I would not be so defensive.”

[Word count 1131]

9m